Search FPC (Free-Per-Click) is our official Search Free-Per-Click™ Logo marking all the platforms that are owned and controlled by its advertisers. For full details contact the managing member.

Here’s what South Africa needs to produce a lot more renewable energy

WhatsApp Us: BROWSEARCH & Feedonomy

13 July, 2022 13:17

The Conversation – 1h ago

South AfricaÔÇÖs power utility, Eskom, has not been able to provide a steady electricity supply for several years now. At the start of the 2022 winter the utility warned the public to expect up to 100 days with rolling power outages. At the end of June there was at times a 6 000 MW shortfall in electricity supply, which corresponds to about 20% of the evening peak demand.

HereÔÇÖs what South Africa needs to produce a lot more renewable energyHereÔÇÖs what South Africa needs to produce a lot more renewable energy

While there is consensus that new electricity generating plants are urgently needed to minimise power outages, there are radically differing views on how this is best achieved. The official electricity plan approved three years ago is already out of date. Its implementation is furthermore two years behind schedule.

One widely promoted view is that increasing electricity generating capacity requires grand scale new renewable energy developments. In 2020 the electricity generated from renewables amounted to a mere 10.5% of the South African national total. This will have grown to about 11.5% as more plants have been completed.

The countryÔÇÖs power generation is still dominated by coal. And itÔÇÖs lagging far behind the global trend towards clean energy.

Most people associate renewable energy exclusively with wind and solar energy, but it includes all technologies that donÔÇÖt process non-replaceable fossil fuels. Fossils include coal, oil, gas and minerals (for example the uranium used in nuclear energy).

Hydropower stations, which extract electricity from the downhill flow of water, are a renewable energy source. This is the major source of electricity in water rich countries like Norway, but only a limited option in drier climates. When water needs to be retained in dams during times of drought then no electricity production is possible.

As South Africa is drought-prone, a major increase in local hydropower generation (currently at 3% of the total) is not feasible.

Other renewable energy technologies like geothermal and tidal power generation work in select localities that are not common in South Africa.

This leaves wind and solar. These sources currently make up about 8% of South AfricaÔÇÖs energy mix.

Wind and solar power

Wind and solar power are very attractive because:

  • South Africa has some of the best solar and wind resources in the world. Solar and wind plants already produce electricity very effectively in many cloudier and less windy environments than South Africa.
  • Solar and wind plants can be built in less than two years. But the pre-construction processes ÔÇô bidding, approvals and such ÔÇô stretch completion times by at least another year.
  • Running costs are very low as there are effectively no fuel purchases. Prices of solar and wind technology have dropped very sharply in the past 10 years. The cost ÔÇô including building and other expenses ÔÇô of solar and wind electricity is now well below the corresponding expenses for electricity from gas, nuclear and even coal.
  • Their extremely low carbon emissions mitigate global warming and makes solar and wind energy attractive for investors.

Solar and wind power however have obvious drawbacks. The main one is that their operational capacity entirely depends on the weather. Furthermore, solar energy production is linked to the day-night cycle, with maximum efficiency around noon. This doesnÔÇÖt coincide with the electricity demand peaks in the early morning and early evening.

Could renewable energy dominate?

The ideal of a national electricity generation network without greenhouse gas emitting coal, gas plants and radioactive waste generating nuclear plants has practically already been achieved in a number of medium-sized countries such as Costa Rica, Iceland and Paraguay. But these mainly rely on hydropower.

Several larger countries, such as Germany, now generate over half of their electricity from renewables. More countries are setting road-maps to achieve 100% renewable electricity.

In theory, with South AfricaÔÇÖs wind and solar resources superior to other countries with 100% renewable electricity ambitions, this should be a relatively easy target to reach. But other countries are often grid connected to neighbours with significant power production. This means they can draw on these when weather conditions are unfavourable.

That is why a renewable electricity system canÔÇÖt become the dominant power source in South Africa until electricity storage technologies become practical and economical.

A target of 50% electricity from renewables is however perfectly feasible. ItÔÇÖs the minimum that the country should aspire to. Even the 2019 electricity plan projected this would happen by 2050.

Renewable energy in South Africa

Considering the climatic advantage, the fraction of electricity generated from renewable energy technologies is surprisingly low. Despite this small fraction, there is significant hostility to renewable developments in some quarters. Some sectors have interests in maintaining the coal-dominated status quo.

In assessing the contribution of renewable energy sources to the electricity supply itÔÇÖs important to distinguish between power (the rate at which it is produced at any particular moment) and energy (the total produced over an extended time period).

In view of the variability of the wind strength and the intermittence of sunlight, these technologies only occasionally produce power at top capacity. In typical South African conditions a 100 MW solar or wind plant only generates about a third of the energy of a functioning 100 MW coal plant.

Thus the recently announced construction of an additional 2 600 MW of wind and solar farms will effectively only produce electricity equivalent to about 900 MW averaged over a day ÔÇô this equates to only about 15% of the worst power shortfalls experienced to date.

Overcoming the present 6 000 MW power shortages therefore requires approximately 15 000 MW of new solar and wind plants. The continuing deterioration in the efficiency of the large coal power plants means that the actual need for new renewable generating capacity in the next five years is closer to 20 000 MW. In the current electricity plan, this scale of renewable energy developments was projected over a time span of 10 years.

There is now an increasing recognition that the energy crisis must be treated as such. A speedy renewable energy boom is the only way to escape the downward spiral in power cuts in the medium term.

President Cyril RamaphosaÔÇÖs announcement that drastic steps are imminent to combat the electricity crisis are likely to amount to a major drive towards more renewables. This will not unduly place the South African electricity supply at the mercy of the weather or developments in storage technology, as the contribution of electricity from coal would still amount to around 60%.

Xie Marketplace
xiemp.com
admin

I know of at least three ad networks that offer genuine FPC, meaning the advertiser does not pay for clicks. Examples: SellFPC.com, Feedonomy.com and SearchFPC.com. SearchFPC (Free-Per-Click) formerly Non PPC is the leading FPC Advertising Network. https://nonppc.com  or  https://searchfpc.com

I read an AI-generated explanation of PPC advertising in Google’s browser and confirmed that FPPC cannot exist because PPC’s entire business model is pay-per-click. The only way FPPC (Free-Pay-Per-Click) could exist is if a network or company offers a promotional or short-term special offer. Otherwise, it doesn’t make sense. PPC is based on paying per click, so the concept of Free-Pay-Per-Click is contradictory. I agree with the AI’s claim that there is no such thing as Free PPC, as PPC is known as pay-per-click. Google Ads controls well over 80% of the market, but PPC is not exclusive to Google; Microsoft (formerly Bing) also uses PPC, albeit with a smaller market share. Therefore, FPPC cannot exist as a standard model; it can only be a temporary promotion. However, Free-Per-Click (FPC) is a different matter. I know of at least three ad networks that offer genuine FPC, meaning the advertiser does not pay for clicks. This is not a short-term marketing gimmick. If a company claims to offer FPC as their business model and it is not a temporary promotion, then it is legitimate. I have contacted these networks, and two of them have confirmed in writing that their business model is FPC. In summary, while FPPC cannot exist beyond short-term promotions, FPC is a genuine model, and I know of at least three networks that offer it. I agree with the AI’s claim that there is no such thing as (FPPC) Free PPC, as PPC is known. However, I disagree with the AI’s claim that FPC does not exist. I know of at least three ad networks that offer genuine FPC, meaning the advertiser does not pay for clicks. Examples: SellFPC.com, Feedonomy.com, SearchFPC.com SearchFPC (Free-Per-Click) formerly Non PPC is the leading FPC Advertising Network. https://nonppc.com or https://searchfpc.com

Share

Interconnected Yet Independent:
Each private ad network could have its own branding, focus, or niche (e.g., a network for tech products, local services, or sustainable goods). However, because they’re part of the federation, an ad placed in one network gets distributed across all connected networks. This creates a shared ecosystem that’s much bigger than the sum of its parts.

Federation of Ad Networks: The Concept

What you’re describing is essentially creating a decentralized, federated ecosystem for advertising. Just like federated social media (think Mastodon in the Fediverse), individual businesses, organizations, or even regions could set up their own ad networks under your framework. Here’s how it could work:

  1. Shared Infrastructure with Local Independence:
    Each company, individual, or organization can create its own private ad network at their own cost. They follow the same Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) to ensure compatibility across the federation. While they manage their local network, all ads, articles, or directory listings from the broader system can also flow into their network, and vice versa. Result: The federation gets bigger with each new network added, exponentially increasing reach and distribution.
  2. Interconnected Yet Independent:
    Each private ad network could have its own branding, focus, or niche (e.g., a network for tech products, local services, or sustainable goods). However, because they’re part of the federation, an ad placed in one network gets distributed across all connected networks. This creates a shared ecosystem that’s much bigger than the sum of its parts.
  3. Built-In Scale:
    Instead of one centralized platform (like Google Ads), you’d have a system where anyone can set up their own ad network with the permission of no less than 75% of shareholders vote, using your tools and principles. This could lead to:
    • Hundreds or thousands of interconnected ad networks.
    • A global marketplace of ads and content, where reach is automatically amplified.
  4. Power to the Advertisers:
    Advertisers who participate in this system get their ads distributed far beyond the original network they used—without paying extra. For example:
    • Someone posts an ad on Network A (e.g., “Feedonomy”).
    • That ad is automatically shared across Network B (“Browsearch”) and Network C (a private network created by a local advertiser).
    • The more networks that join the federation, the wider the reach—essentially turning the federation into a massive ad distribution system.
  5. Electrifying Idea:
    By telling advertisers, “Your ads are now being distributed on two (or more) new platforms, at no extra cost,” it creates excitement and a sense of growing value. It’s not just an ad network anymore—it’s a movement.

Why It Could Work Better Than Social Media

Unlike social media, where content is tied to user-generated posts and engagement, your system focuses purely on commerce and advertising. This is simpler, clearer, and potentially more scalable because:

  • Businesses and advertisers already want distribution; you’re just giving them a new, federated way to achieve it.
  • There’s less dependency on the kind of “social interaction” that makes social media complex and harder to manage at scale.

Key Benefits of This Model

  1. Exponential Growth:
    Each new network adds value to the entire system. A single advertiser on Network D could now see their ad distributed across all networks, multiplying visibility without multiplying cost. Similarly, each new network benefits from ads already placed in the system.
  2. Decentralized yet Unified:
    Just like federated social media, each network operates independently but adheres to the same principles (e.g., T&Cs, shared protocols, equity models). This avoids the pitfalls of centralization while still enabling a cohesive experience.
  3. Scalable for Any Size:
    A large company could build their own private ad network, while a small local business could just plug into an existing network and still benefit from the federation.
  4. Built-In Redundancy:
    If one network struggles or fails, the others keep functioning. This resiliency makes the system far more robust than a single, centralized platform.

1 thought on “Here’s what South Africa needs to produce a lot more renewable energy

You can advertise product ads just like Google Product Ads PPC (Pay-Per-Click)—same benefits (structured listings, images, pricing, direct click-through to your site) — except you don’t pay for clicks. Content creators can promote articles, videos, and podcasts to drive traffic to their own sites/channels. Companies can place affiliate-style ads. When a partner sets an incentive (for example, 5% back up to US$1,000), we pass 100% of that incentive to the customer—our partners believe the buyer deserves the thank-you, not the ad platform. This is our ongoing Free-Per-Click model, not a short-term promotion. What’s expected: honest listings, clear pricing, accurate links to your own site. Not allowed: spam, misleading claims, illegal items, or anything that violates local laws or our content rules. How to start: create an account ? publish your ad (product, content, or affiliate) ? include your site link ? we review ? it goes live.

Product Departments

New Departments

Electronics

Electronics

BrowSearch Product Categories

BrowSearch (B2B)

What Are Search FPC Product Ads?


Search FPC (Free-Per-Click) Product Ads are Free listings that let businesses showcase products with an image, title, and description. Unlike Pay-Per-Click (PPC), there are no costs per click — ads stay visible without ongoing payments. 

Shoppers who click an ad are sent directly to the seller’s website or marketplace (e.g., eBay, Etsy, or their own store) to complete the purchase. Advertisers can link both their own site and marketplace listings to maximize reach. 

Because Search FPC is part of a federated network, ads may also appear across partner platforms at no extra cost.